Assessing Sources
In her lecture about the assessing sources, Amanda Strong, a professor in the
Medical Genetics Department at McGill University and she graduated from
Concordia University. However, she talked about this subject in different areas
for example, how to find the good and bad websites, with a nice explanation to
each supporting point.
Amanda started talked by general ideas and she said the media is not
always true , especially on the internet. We should be careful when we use it
sure it's very helpful and useful and an important in our daily life. But, don't
trust everything because sometimes it could be dangerous , and she added if
we want to use it for a background information that will be much better. She
mention some ways and steps can help us, to know the truth and to find the
reality on the internet. For example, since you discover unclear information
to not use it and you must know from where it come as journal, public
opinion. Also, make sure who is funding the websites and is it something
official or just known sector and she considered evidence in order to deal
with this compound problem. Firstly, if you find a missing number or the date
maybe it's a truth information, but it from long time ago. Thirdly, ask your self
where are the references and does the information updated frankly. Moreover,
the bad or fabrication websites will not have a strong statistic and in this
situation she said, leave it and ignore those kinds of web pages. On the other
hand, you will find an excellent statistic on the good web pages, as the
government or news. Amanda focused on the paid advertising one of the huge
issues for example, she found that some companies are paying to be on the
first page as a result to our researcher. In addition, some of them they put
big flashing pictures to attract us for example, losing some weight or any
interesting topic. So, when you found yourself on this condition go and look
for the sources where it come from. Like when google something *keep in your
mind* about the background information, is it original source. If it an article on
the newspaper or magazine who are the reporter, because maybe it's look very
nice. But, in fact that doesn't give the right information. Finally, she pointed out
that the untruth websites used a popular logo to except more people for
example, CNN or FOX news. Also, she said it's difficult to deal with it, but
"be aware about it" that something very necessary and could avoid the
problem. She ended with an example of buying blue pen either than the black,
to show us how we could trust the positive opinion.
In my opinion it was wonderful lecture and kind of exciting subject and the
presenter was also a good professor. But, as I told my group the problem we
cannot make a presentation it just good to watch it, maybe there wasn't enough
main idea.
I enjoyed at the end and I think we learned from the topic and this experience.
Friday, July 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hi Mo,
I hope my post will be accepted this time.
Maybe some students will read your lecture project post and have some good ideas about evaluating websites they look at.
Your blog looks different - much more "blue" than I remember.
Post a Comment